For Authors
Download the article submission guidelines
Fill the digital form about the author
Example of the article submission
Articles by doctors of science, candidates of sciences, young scientists (postgraduates, applicants, students), as well as other persons who have higher education and are engaged in scientific activities, are accepted for publication. The authors shall submit articles that are solely their own original research, following the rules of citation and reference. The submission of knowingly false information or plagiarism is unacceptable and unethical. Also, only articles that have not previously been published in other journals are accepted.
In order to publish an article in the scientific journal, it is necessary to send via e-mail to the Editorial Board the following materials:
1. Information about the author.
2. An article drawn up in accordance with the specified requirements should be sent in electronic format to
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Attention! It is necessary to indicate the code of the journal 2814 in the subject line.
- for persons without a scientific degree – they should additionally send a scanned review of a scientific supervisor or a person with a scientific degree (the signature of the reviewer must be certified in the personnel department of the establishment or with a stamp of faculty (institute)).
The authors receive a letter about the review results – see review procedure (rejected, accepted with revisions, accepted) and, in case of successful passage, payment details of the publication fee are provided.
- to send a scanned receipt of payment for publishing a scientific article. The cost of publication is 1200 UAH (to 12 pages inclusive). The publication fee covers the costs associated with editing articles, making-up of the journal, as well as the postal mailing of the reference on the article’s publication.
The articles are checked for plagiarism using the software StrikePlagiarism.com developed by the Polish company Plagiat.pl.
The structure of a scientific article must necessarily include the following essential elements:
1. Problem statement in general and its connection with important scientific or practical tasks.
2. Analysis of recent researches and publications the author relies on that discuss this issue and how to solve it. Also, to allocate previously unsettled parts of the general problem studied in the article.
3. Formulation of goals of the article (task setting).
4. The main research material with the full justification of the scientific results obtained.
5. Conclusions from this study and prospects for further research in this area.
Thematic sections of the scientific and practical journal:
1. Economics.
2. Accounting and Taxation.
3. Finance, Banking, Insurance and Stock Market.
4. Management.
5. Marketing.
6. International Economic Relations.
Technical requirements:
The volume of the article – from 10 to 20 pages, А4 format (297 x 210), margins: left – 25 mm, right, top and bottom – 20 mm, made in Microsoft Word. Type all text of the article, bibliographic list, abstracts, etc. in Times New Roman font, size – 14 pt, spacing – one-and-a-half. If the article includes tables, formulas, and/or figures, they should be compact, titled, text font – Times New Roman, size – 12 pt. The size of tables and figures should not be larger than the width of the page. Mathematical formulas should be thoroughly checked and clearly printed. The formulas should be made using the built-in formula editor MS Equation. The number of tables, formulas, and illustrations should be minimal and relevant. Figures and tables on album pages are not accepted.
The article should have the following structural elements:
UDC index (in the upper left corner of the page); section of the journal; surname and initials of the author(s) (no more than 3 authors), scientific degree, academic rank; place of work (study); the article’s title; text of the article; list of references. The article should contain abstracts and keywords in Ukrainian and English languages. Abstract volume in Ukrainian – at least 700 characters, the number of keywords/phrases – at least 5 positions. An extended English abstract should be at least 1800 characters long. In this English abstract, the author should indicate the relevance of the topic. It is necessary to cover the issues discussed without presenting the results. The author should not cite any research or other sources of information. The abstract should be written without subdivisions. Its text should be concise and original. It is inappropriate to use text from the article literally. If the article is in English, then the extended abstract must be written in Ukrainian.
Language of publications: Ukrainian, English.
List of sources used and References.
List of sources used should be made in textual order or alphabetical order (prepared according to the interstate standard DSTU 8302:2015 “Information and documentation. Bibliographic reference. General requirements and rules of compilation”). Links to sources used should be made in square brackets in the text, indicating the page numbers of the relevant source: for example, [3, p. 234] or [2, p. 35; 8, p. 234]. References need to be done in the Roman alphabet in the APA style (APA Style Reference Citations). Examples of References.
Review procedure
Review (expert evaluation) of manuscripts of scientific articles is carried out in order to maintain the high scientific and theoretical level of the scientific journal and to select the most valuable and relevant scientific works.
The double-blind (anonymous) review is used in the journal: no personal data of the author/authors are disclosed to the reviewer; no personal data of the reviewer are disclosed to the author/authors.
Scientific articles submitted to the editorial board are subject to primary control over compliance with the requirements for scientific articles.
The initial expert evaluation of a scientific article is carried out by the editor-in-chief or the deputy editor-in-chief.
The editorial board defines a reviewer from the editorial board who oversees the relevant scientific field for the article submitted for publication.
In the absence of a curator of the relevant field, the editorial board appoints an external reviewer for this work.
Reviewers (both editorial board members and external reviewers) should be well-known specialists in the subject of the submitted manuscript and have publications in this field of study (preferably in the last 5 years).
After reviewing the scientific article, the reviewer concludes:
- the article is recommended for publication;
- the article is recommended for publication after its revision by the author, taking into account the comments made;
- the article is not recommended for publication.
If the reviewer recommends the article for publication after its revision, taking into account the comments, or does not recommend the article for publication, the reason for such a decision should be stated in the review. When reviewing, the editorial board recommends to use a standard form of review developed by the editorial board and posted on the journal’s website.
When reviewing scientific articles, reviewers should:
- to pay special attention to the relevance of the scientific issue raised in the article;
- to evaluate how the author’s conclusions relate to the existing scientific concepts;
- to evaluate the authors’ adherence to the rules of scientific ethics, the correctness of references to literary sources.
Scientific articles may be referred for additional review. Reasons for re-reviewing may be:
- insufficient level of initial expert opinion;
- the sharp controversy of the provisions expressed in the scientific article.